A set of healthcare-related information that is assembled together into a single logical package that provides a single coherent statement of meaning, establishes its own context and that has clinical attestation with regard to who is making the statement. A Composition defines the structure and narrative content necessary for a document. However, a Composition alone does not constitute a document. Rather, the Composition must be the first entry in a Bundle where Bundle.type=document, and any other resources referenced from Composition must be included as subsequent entries in the Bundle (for example Patient, Practitioner, Encounter, etc.).

While the focus of this specification is on patient-specific clinical statements, this resource can also apply to other healthcare-related statements such as study protocol designs, healthcare invoices and other activities that are not necessarily patient-specific or clinical.

The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.

bedingtes Pflichtfeld/bedingtes MS: Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen MÜSSEN über eine id verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über eine idverfügen.

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.

A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

HTML-Repräsentation des Dokumenten-Headers.
Bitte Hinweise unter Document Presentation beachten.
Der DokumentenHeader muss mindestens die folgenden Informationen enthalten:

• Composition.subject:Patient.name.family
• Composition.subject:Patient.birthDate
• Composition.subject:Patient.identifier:pid
• Composition.status
• Composition.type.text
• Composition.date
• Composition.title
• Composition.author.display

The status of the narrative - whether it's entirely generated (from just the defined data or the extensions too), or whether a human authored it and it may contain additional data.

The status of a resource narrative.

The actual narrative content, a stripped down version of XHTML.

The contents of the html element are an XHTML fragment containing only the basic html formatting elements described in chapters 7-11 and 15 of the HTML 4.0 standard, <a> elements (either name or href), images and internally contained stylesheets. The XHTML content SHALL NOT contain a head, a body, external stylesheet references, scripts, forms, base/link/xlink, frames, iframes and objects.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

A version-independent identifier for the Composition. This identifier stays constant as the composition is changed over time.

Eine vom erzeugenden Subsystem vergebene, eindeutige DokumentenID.
Wenn es sich bei dem verwendeten Identifier um eine OID oder UUID handelt, so ist hier der Wert urn:ietf:rfc:3986 anzugeben und in Identifier.value das jeweilige Präfix urn:uuid: bzw. urn:oid: zu verwenden.
Beispiel:

\<identifier> 
    \<system value="urn:ietf:rfc:3986">  
    \<value value="urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.6.96"> 
\</identifier>

The purpose of this identifier.

Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary.

Identifies the purpose for this identifier, if known .

Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers.

Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.

Hier ist stets der eindeutige Name (URL) des Namensraums anzugeben, aus dem der Identifier stammt. Hinweise zur Festlegung der URLs für lokale Namensräume sind in den Deutschen Basisprofilen beschrieben.
Begründung Pflichtfeld: system stellt in Kombination mit value die Eindeutigkeit eines Identifiers sicher.

There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.

The portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system.

Enthält den eigentlichen Wert des Identifiers.
Begründung Pflichtfeld: Ist der Wert nicht bekannt, sollte der gesamte Slice weggelassen werden.

The workflow/clinical status of this composition. The status is a marker for the clinical standing of the document.

Im Kontext diese Moduls ist nur der Austausch finaler Berichte vorgesehen. Ein Mechanismus zur Änderung oder Ersetzung bereits übermittelter Daten ist derzeit nicht spezifiziert. Hier ist stets der Wert final anzugeben.

The workflow/clinical status of the composition.

Need to be able to mark interim, amended, or withdrawn compositions or documents.

Specifies the particular kind of composition (e.g. History and Physical, Discharge Summary, Progress Note). This usually equates to the purpose of making the composition.

Begründung zu Must Support: Der Dokumenttyp ist für die Identifikation des Berichtes und die Zuordnung zu einem Subsystem für die weitere Verarbeitung erforderlich.

Hinweis für Implementierer: Der zu übermittelnde Bericht repräsentiert eine Zusammenfassung der strukturierten Daten aus dem Subsystem. Das Dokument KANN z.B. mittels KDL oder IHE-D-XDS-Typecodes klassifiziert werden.
Es KANN derzeit jedoch auch eine rein textuelle Beschreibung des Dokumenttyps angegeben werden.

Während KDL-Codes eine feingranulare Dokumentenklassifikation für die gezielte Suche nach medizinischen und Administrativen Dokumenten ermöglichen, sind IHE-XDS-Type-Codes für den einrichtungsübergreifenden Dokumentenaustausch maßgeblich. Der XDS-Type-Code kann mit Hilfe der bereitgestellten ConceptMaps aus dem KDL-Code ermittelt werden. Weitere Typisierungen (z.B. nach SNOMED oder LOINC) sind uneingeschränkt erlaubt. [Konsens der Arbeitsgruppe vom 18.02.2022]. Im Falle, dass der Code 'UNK' entsprechend der ConceptMap verwendet werden soll, MUSS das System 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-NullFlavor' verwendet werden.

Type of a composition.

Key metadata element describing the composition, used in searching/filtering.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

Freitextliche Beschreibung oder assoziierter Displaywert der primären Codierung des Dokumenttyps.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

A categorization for the type of the composition - helps for indexing and searching. This may be implied by or derived from the code specified in the Composition Type.

Begründung zu Must Support: Die Klassifizierung kann zur Strukturierung der Berichte genutzt werden, in dem Fall, dass das Narrative des Berichts dem Benutzer angezeigt wird. Das Dokument KANN z.B. mittels LOINC oder IHE-D-XDS-Classcodes klassifiziert werden.

High-level kind of a clinical document at a macro level.

Helps humans to assess whether the composition is of interest when viewing an index of compositions or documents.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

Who or what the composition is about. The composition can be about a person, (patient or healthcare practitioner), a device (e.g. a machine) or even a group of subjects (such as a document about a herd of livestock, or a set of patients that share a common exposure).

Begründung Must-Support: Ein Patientenbezug des Dokument MUSS stets zum Zwecke der Nachvollziehbarkeit und Datenintegrität vorliegen.

Essential metadata for searching for the composition. Identifies who and/or what the composition/document is about.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Begründung Pflichtfeld: Die Verlinkung auf eine Patienten-Ressource dient der technischen Zuordnung der Dokumentation zu einem Patienten und ermöglicht wichtige API-Funktionen wie verkettete Suche, (Reverse-)Include etc. Im ISik Kontext MUSS die referenzierte Ressource konform zu ISiKPatient sein. Jenseits von ISiK KÖNNEN weitere Instanzen mit anderen Profilen referenziert werden.

Describes the clinical encounter or type of care this documentation is associated with.

Begründung Must-Support: Ein Aufenthaltsbezug des Dokument MUSS stets zum Zwecke der Nachvollziehbarkeit und Datenintegrität vorliegen.

Provides context for the composition and supports searching.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Begründung Pflichtfeld: Die Verlinkung auf eine Encounter-Ressource dient der technischen Zuordnung der Dokumentation zu einem Aufenthalt und ermöglicht wichtige API-Funktionen wie verkettete Suche, (Reverse-)Include etc. WICHTIGER Hinweis für Implementierer: Die Zuordnung MUSS auf einen Encounter der Ebene "Abteilungskontakt" (siehe hierzu Basismodul > UseCases > Abbildung des Konstruktes "Fall") erfolgen.
Bei der Auswahl des Encounters ist zu beachten, dass unter einer (Abrechnungs-)"Fallnummer" (hier: Encounter.account) unter Umständen mehrere Encounter gruppiert sein können (z.B. stationärer Besuch mit mehreren vor- und nachstationären Aufenthalten.) Im ISik Kontext MUSS die referenzierte Ressource konform zu ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung sein. Jenseits von ISiK KÖNNEN weitere Instanzen mit anderen Profilen referenziert werden.

The composition editing time, when the composition was last logically changed by the author.

Datum der letzten Änderung des Dokumentes

dateTime is used for tracking, organizing versions and searching. Note that this is the time of authoring. When packaged in a document, Bundle.timestamp is the date of packaging.

Identifies who is responsible for the information in the composition, not necessarily who typed it in.

In der aktuellen Ausbaustufe von ISiK ist die Verwendung der textuellen Repräsentation (display) von Autor und Subsystem ausreichend. Die darüber hinausgehende Verlinkung auf Practitioner bzw. Device-Ressourcen KANN implementiert werden.

Identifies who is responsible for the content.

Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.

Freitextliche Bezeichnung des Verfassers (Person oder Subsystem/Gerät)

Official human-readable label for the composition.

Die Dokumentenbezeichnung dient der Darstellung des Dokumentes in einer Übersicht, z.B. in einer Patientenakte, und KANN der schnellen Auffindbarkeit eines gesuchten Dokumentes dienen. Geeignete Bezeichnungen sind zum Beispiel:

• 'Kleines Blutbild vom 13.10.2020'
• 'Pathologiebefund (Abstrich) vom 13.10.2020'
• 'Blutgasmessung vom 13.10.2020 14:14h'

The root of the sections that make up the composition.

Das Dokument kann in mehrere Kapitel und Unterkapitel gegliedert werden.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

The label for this particular section. This will be part of the rendered content for the document, and is often used to build a table of contents.

The title identifies the section for a human reader. The title must be consistent with the narrative of the resource that is the target of the section.content reference. Generally, sections SHOULD have titles, but in some documents, it is unnecessary or inappropriate. Typically, this is where a section has subsections that have their own adequately distinguishing title, or documents that only have a single section. Most Implementation Guides will make section title to be a required element.

Section headings are often standardized for different types of documents. They give guidance to humans on how the document is organized.

A human-readable narrative that contains the attested content of the section, used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative.

menschenlesbare HTML-Repräsentation des Inhalts dieses Kapitels.
Hinweise: Für Aggregation einer vollständigen menschenlesbaren Repräsentation MÜSSEN die Repräsentationen der einzelnen Kapitel an die Repräsentation der Metadaten (Composition.text) angehängt werden. Für die Separierung KÖNNEN einfache <div>-Tags verwendet werden. Es ist zu beachten, dass Kapitel auch Unterkapitel enthalten KÖNNEN (Composition.section.section), die bei der Aggregation entsprechend berücksichtigt werden MÜSSEN.
Die Mindestanforderungen an den Inhalt der menschenlesbaren Repräsentation umfasst folgende Informationen:

• section.title + Freitext oder
• section.title + Resource.text der referenzierten Ressource oder
• section.title + eine aggregierte Repräsentation von Resource.text, wenn in einer Section mehrere Ressourcen referenziert werden (z.B. eine tabellarische Auflistung mehrere Blutdruckmesswerte, Diagnosen oder Allergien).

A nested sub-section within this section.

Nested sections are primarily used to help human readers navigate to particular portions of the document.

bedingtes Pflichtfeld/bedingtes MS: Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen MÜSSEN über eine id verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über eine idverfügen.

Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen SOLLEN über eine versionID verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über eine versionIDverfügen.

Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen SOLLEN über ein lastUpdate verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über ein lastUpdateverfügen.

HTML-Repräsentation des Dokumenten-Headers.
Bitte Hinweise unter Document Presentation beachten.
Der DokumentenHeader muss mindestens die folgenden Informationen enthalten:

• Composition.subject:Patient.name.family
• Composition.subject:Patient.birthDate
• Composition.subject:Patient.identifier:pid
• Composition.status
• Composition.type.text
• Composition.date
• Composition.title
• Composition.author.display

Eine vom erzeugenden Subsystem vergebene, eindeutige DokumentenID.
Wenn es sich bei dem verwendeten Identifier um eine OID oder UUID handelt, so ist hier der Wert urn:ietf:rfc:3986 anzugeben und in Identifier.value das jeweilige Präfix urn:uuid: bzw. urn:oid: zu verwenden.
Beispiel:

\<identifier> 
    \<system value="urn:ietf:rfc:3986">  
    \<value value="urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.6.96"> 
\</identifier>

Hier ist stets der eindeutige Name (URL) des Namensraums anzugeben, aus dem der Identifier stammt. Hinweise zur Festlegung der URLs für lokale Namensräume sind in den Deutschen Basisprofilen beschrieben.
Begründung Pflichtfeld: system stellt in Kombination mit value die Eindeutigkeit eines Identifiers sicher.

Enthält den eigentlichen Wert des Identifiers.
Begründung Pflichtfeld: Ist der Wert nicht bekannt, sollte der gesamte Slice weggelassen werden.

Im Kontext diese Moduls ist nur der Austausch finaler Berichte vorgesehen. Ein Mechanismus zur Änderung oder Ersetzung bereits übermittelter Daten ist derzeit nicht spezifiziert. Hier ist stets der Wert final anzugeben.

Begründung zu Must Support: Der Dokumenttyp ist für die Identifikation des Berichtes und die Zuordnung zu einem Subsystem für die weitere Verarbeitung erforderlich.

Hinweis für Implementierer: Der zu übermittelnde Bericht repräsentiert eine Zusammenfassung der strukturierten Daten aus dem Subsystem. Das Dokument KANN z.B. mittels KDL oder IHE-D-XDS-Typecodes klassifiziert werden.
Es KANN derzeit jedoch auch eine rein textuelle Beschreibung des Dokumenttyps angegeben werden.

Während KDL-Codes eine feingranulare Dokumentenklassifikation für die gezielte Suche nach medizinischen und Administrativen Dokumenten ermöglichen, sind IHE-XDS-Type-Codes für den einrichtungsübergreifenden Dokumentenaustausch maßgeblich. Der XDS-Type-Code kann mit Hilfe der bereitgestellten ConceptMaps aus dem KDL-Code ermittelt werden. Weitere Typisierungen (z.B. nach SNOMED oder LOINC) sind uneingeschränkt erlaubt. [Konsens der Arbeitsgruppe vom 18.02.2022]. Im Falle, dass der Code 'UNK' entsprechend der ConceptMap verwendet werden soll, MUSS das System 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-NullFlavor' verwendet werden.

Freitextliche Beschreibung oder assoziierter Displaywert der primären Codierung des Dokumenttyps.

Begründung zu Must Support: Die Klassifizierung kann zur Strukturierung der Berichte genutzt werden, in dem Fall, dass das Narrative des Berichts dem Benutzer angezeigt wird. Das Dokument KANN z.B. mittels LOINC oder IHE-D-XDS-Classcodes klassifiziert werden.

Begründung Must-Support: Ein Patientenbezug des Dokument MUSS stets zum Zwecke der Nachvollziehbarkeit und Datenintegrität vorliegen.

Begründung Pflichtfeld: Die Verlinkung auf eine Patienten-Ressource dient der technischen Zuordnung der Dokumentation zu einem Patienten und ermöglicht wichtige API-Funktionen wie verkettete Suche, (Reverse-)Include etc. Im ISik Kontext MUSS die referenzierte Ressource konform zu ISiKPatient sein. Jenseits von ISiK KÖNNEN weitere Instanzen mit anderen Profilen referenziert werden.

Begründung Must-Support: Ein Aufenthaltsbezug des Dokument MUSS stets zum Zwecke der Nachvollziehbarkeit und Datenintegrität vorliegen.

Begründung Pflichtfeld: Die Verlinkung auf eine Encounter-Ressource dient der technischen Zuordnung der Dokumentation zu einem Aufenthalt und ermöglicht wichtige API-Funktionen wie verkettete Suche, (Reverse-)Include etc. WICHTIGER Hinweis für Implementierer: Die Zuordnung MUSS auf einen Encounter der Ebene "Abteilungskontakt" (siehe hierzu Basismodul > UseCases > Abbildung des Konstruktes "Fall") erfolgen.
Bei der Auswahl des Encounters ist zu beachten, dass unter einer (Abrechnungs-)"Fallnummer" (hier: Encounter.account) unter Umständen mehrere Encounter gruppiert sein können (z.B. stationärer Besuch mit mehreren vor- und nachstationären Aufenthalten.) Im ISik Kontext MUSS die referenzierte Ressource konform zu ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung sein. Jenseits von ISiK KÖNNEN weitere Instanzen mit anderen Profilen referenziert werden.

Datum der letzten Änderung des Dokumentes

In der aktuellen Ausbaustufe von ISiK ist die Verwendung der textuellen Repräsentation (display) von Autor und Subsystem ausreichend. Die darüber hinausgehende Verlinkung auf Practitioner bzw. Device-Ressourcen KANN implementiert werden.

Freitextliche Bezeichnung des Verfassers (Person oder Subsystem/Gerät)

Die Dokumentenbezeichnung dient der Darstellung des Dokumentes in einer Übersicht, z.B. in einer Patientenakte, und KANN der schnellen Auffindbarkeit eines gesuchten Dokumentes dienen. Geeignete Bezeichnungen sind zum Beispiel:

• 'Kleines Blutbild vom 13.10.2020'
• 'Pathologiebefund (Abstrich) vom 13.10.2020'
• 'Blutgasmessung vom 13.10.2020 14:14h'

Das Dokument kann in mehrere Kapitel und Unterkapitel gegliedert werden.

menschenlesbare HTML-Repräsentation des Inhalts dieses Kapitels.
Hinweise: Für Aggregation einer vollständigen menschenlesbaren Repräsentation MÜSSEN die Repräsentationen der einzelnen Kapitel an die Repräsentation der Metadaten (Composition.text) angehängt werden. Für die Separierung KÖNNEN einfache <div>-Tags verwendet werden. Es ist zu beachten, dass Kapitel auch Unterkapitel enthalten KÖNNEN (Composition.section.section), die bei der Aggregation entsprechend berücksichtigt werden MÜSSEN.
Die Mindestanforderungen an den Inhalt der menschenlesbaren Repräsentation umfasst folgende Informationen:

• section.title + Freitext oder
• section.title + Resource.text der referenzierten Ressource oder
• section.title + eine aggregierte Repräsentation von Resource.text, wenn in einer Section mehrere Ressourcen referenziert werden (z.B. eine tabellarische Auflistung mehrere Blutdruckmesswerte, Diagnosen oder Allergien).

A set of healthcare-related information that is assembled together into a single logical package that provides a single coherent statement of meaning, establishes its own context and that has clinical attestation with regard to who is making the statement. A Composition defines the structure and narrative content necessary for a document. However, a Composition alone does not constitute a document. Rather, the Composition must be the first entry in a Bundle where Bundle.type=document, and any other resources referenced from Composition must be included as subsequent entries in the Bundle (for example Patient, Practitioner, Encounter, etc.).

While the focus of this specification is on patient-specific clinical statements, this resource can also apply to other healthcare-related statements such as study protocol designs, healthcare invoices and other activities that are not necessarily patient-specific or clinical.

The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.

bedingtes Pflichtfeld/bedingtes MS: Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen MÜSSEN über eine id verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über eine idverfügen.

The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The version specific identifier, as it appears in the version portion of the URL. This value changes when the resource is created, updated, or deleted.

Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen SOLLEN über eine versionID verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über eine versionIDverfügen.

When the resource last changed - e.g. when the version changed.

Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen SOLLEN über ein lastUpdate verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über ein lastUpdateverfügen.

A uri that identifies the source system of the resource. This provides a minimal amount of Provenance information that can be used to track or differentiate the source of information in the resource. The source may identify another FHIR server, document, message, database, etc.

In the provenance resource, this corresponds to Provenance.entity.what[x]. The exact use of the source (and the implied Provenance.entity.role) is left to implementer discretion. Only one nominated source is allowed; for additional provenance details, a full Provenance resource should be used.

This element can be used to indicate where the current master source of a resource that has a canonical URL if the resource is no longer hosted at the canonical URL.

A list of profiles (references to StructureDefinition resources) that this resource claims to conform to. The URL is a reference to StructureDefinition.url.

It is up to the server and/or other infrastructure of policy to determine whether/how these claims are verified and/or updated over time. The list of profile URLs is a set.

Security labels applied to this resource. These tags connect specific resources to the overall security policy and infrastructure.

The security labels can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of security labels is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored.

Security Labels from the Healthcare Privacy and Security Classification System.

Tags applied to this resource. Tags are intended to be used to identify and relate resources to process and workflow, and applications are not required to consider the tags when interpreting the meaning of a resource.

The tags can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of tags is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored.

Codes that represent various types of tags, commonly workflow-related; e.g. "Needs review by Dr. Jones".

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.

The base language in which the resource is written.

Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource. Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).

A human language.

A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

HTML-Repräsentation des Dokumenten-Headers.
Bitte Hinweise unter Document Presentation beachten.
Der DokumentenHeader muss mindestens die folgenden Informationen enthalten:

• Composition.subject:Patient.name.family
• Composition.subject:Patient.birthDate
• Composition.subject:Patient.identifier:pid
• Composition.status
• Composition.type.text
• Composition.date
• Composition.title
• Composition.author.display

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The status of the narrative - whether it's entirely generated (from just the defined data or the extensions too), or whether a human authored it and it may contain additional data.

The status of a resource narrative.

The actual narrative content, a stripped down version of XHTML.

The contents of the html element are an XHTML fragment containing only the basic html formatting elements described in chapters 7-11 and 15 of the HTML 4.0 standard, <a> elements (either name or href), images and internally contained stylesheets. The XHTML content SHALL NOT contain a head, a body, external stylesheet references, scripts, forms, base/link/xlink, frames, iframes and objects.

These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.

This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. Contained resources may have profiles and tags In their meta elements, but SHALL NOT have security labels.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

A version-independent identifier for the Composition. This identifier stays constant as the composition is changed over time.

Eine vom erzeugenden Subsystem vergebene, eindeutige DokumentenID.
Wenn es sich bei dem verwendeten Identifier um eine OID oder UUID handelt, so ist hier der Wert urn:ietf:rfc:3986 anzugeben und in Identifier.value das jeweilige Präfix urn:uuid: bzw. urn:oid: zu verwenden.
Beispiel:

\<identifier> 
    \<system value="urn:ietf:rfc:3986">  
    \<value value="urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.6.96"> 
\</identifier>

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The purpose of this identifier.

Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary.

Identifies the purpose for this identifier, if known .

Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers.

A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.

A coded type for an identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.

Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.

Hier ist stets der eindeutige Name (URL) des Namensraums anzugeben, aus dem der Identifier stammt. Hinweise zur Festlegung der URLs für lokale Namensräume sind in den Deutschen Basisprofilen beschrieben.
Begründung Pflichtfeld: system stellt in Kombination mit value die Eindeutigkeit eines Identifiers sicher.

There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.

The portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system.

Enthält den eigentlichen Wert des Identifiers.
Begründung Pflichtfeld: Ist der Wert nicht bekannt, sollte der gesamte Slice weggelassen werden.

Time period during which identifier is/was valid for use.

Organization that issued/manages the identifier.

The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.

The workflow/clinical status of this composition. The status is a marker for the clinical standing of the document.

Im Kontext diese Moduls ist nur der Austausch finaler Berichte vorgesehen. Ein Mechanismus zur Änderung oder Ersetzung bereits übermittelter Daten ist derzeit nicht spezifiziert. Hier ist stets der Wert final anzugeben.

The workflow/clinical status of the composition.

Need to be able to mark interim, amended, or withdrawn compositions or documents.

Specifies the particular kind of composition (e.g. History and Physical, Discharge Summary, Progress Note). This usually equates to the purpose of making the composition.

Begründung zu Must Support: Der Dokumenttyp ist für die Identifikation des Berichtes und die Zuordnung zu einem Subsystem für die weitere Verarbeitung erforderlich.

Hinweis für Implementierer: Der zu übermittelnde Bericht repräsentiert eine Zusammenfassung der strukturierten Daten aus dem Subsystem. Das Dokument KANN z.B. mittels KDL oder IHE-D-XDS-Typecodes klassifiziert werden.
Es KANN derzeit jedoch auch eine rein textuelle Beschreibung des Dokumenttyps angegeben werden.

Während KDL-Codes eine feingranulare Dokumentenklassifikation für die gezielte Suche nach medizinischen und Administrativen Dokumenten ermöglichen, sind IHE-XDS-Type-Codes für den einrichtungsübergreifenden Dokumentenaustausch maßgeblich. Der XDS-Type-Code kann mit Hilfe der bereitgestellten ConceptMaps aus dem KDL-Code ermittelt werden. Weitere Typisierungen (z.B. nach SNOMED oder LOINC) sind uneingeschränkt erlaubt. [Konsens der Arbeitsgruppe vom 18.02.2022]. Im Falle, dass der Code 'UNK' entsprechend der ConceptMap verwendet werden soll, MUSS das System 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-NullFlavor' verwendet werden.

Type of a composition.

Key metadata element describing the composition, used in searching/filtering.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

Freitextliche Beschreibung oder assoziierter Displaywert der primären Codierung des Dokumenttyps.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

A categorization for the type of the composition - helps for indexing and searching. This may be implied by or derived from the code specified in the Composition Type.

Begründung zu Must Support: Die Klassifizierung kann zur Strukturierung der Berichte genutzt werden, in dem Fall, dass das Narrative des Berichts dem Benutzer angezeigt wird. Das Dokument KANN z.B. mittels LOINC oder IHE-D-XDS-Classcodes klassifiziert werden.

High-level kind of a clinical document at a macro level.

Helps humans to assess whether the composition is of interest when viewing an index of compositions or documents.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Who or what the composition is about. The composition can be about a person, (patient or healthcare practitioner), a device (e.g. a machine) or even a group of subjects (such as a document about a herd of livestock, or a set of patients that share a common exposure).

Begründung Must-Support: Ein Patientenbezug des Dokument MUSS stets zum Zwecke der Nachvollziehbarkeit und Datenintegrität vorliegen.

Essential metadata for searching for the composition. Identifies who and/or what the composition/document is about.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Begründung Pflichtfeld: Die Verlinkung auf eine Patienten-Ressource dient der technischen Zuordnung der Dokumentation zu einem Patienten und ermöglicht wichtige API-Funktionen wie verkettete Suche, (Reverse-)Include etc. Im ISik Kontext MUSS die referenzierte Ressource konform zu ISiKPatient sein. Jenseits von ISiK KÖNNEN weitere Instanzen mit anderen Profilen referenziert werden.

The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent.

The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).

This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.

Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model).