Unable to compare with previous version: Unable to find version history at https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ (Problem #1 with package-list.json at https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/: Not Found)
IPA Comparison:
n/a
IPS Comparison:
n/a
Validation Flags:
On: autoLoad; Off: hintAboutNonMustSupport, anyExtensionsAllowed, checkAggregation, showReferenceMessages, noExperimentalContent, displayWarnings
This IG is version 4.0.1, while the IG 'hl7.fhir.uv.subscriptions-backport.r4' is from version 4.0.0
ImplementationGuide.dependency[5].url
warning
The canonical URL for an Implementation Guide must point directly to the implementation guide resource, not to the Implementation Guide as a whole
?pkp-1?
error
The reference http://ig.fhir.de/igs/medication/StructureDefinition/DosageDE could not be resolved
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/DorisQuelle. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/DorisZiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Medication/ExampleISiKMedikament1. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Medication/ExampleISiKMedikament2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Medication/ExampleISiKMedikament3. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Medication/ExampleISiKMedikament4. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Medication/ExampleISiKMedikament5. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Medication/ExampleISiKMedikament6. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Medication/ExampleISiKMedikament7. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Medication/ExampleISiKMedikament8. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Medication/ExampleISiKMedikament9. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationStatement/ExampleISiKMedikationsInformation1. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationStatement/ExampleISiKMedikationsInformation2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationStatement/ExampleISiKMedikationsInformation3. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationStatement/ExampleISiKMedikationsInformation4. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationStatement/ExampleISiKMedikationsInformation5. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationStatement/ExampleISiKMedikationsInformation6. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationStatement/ExampleISiKMedikationsInformationParkinson1. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationStatement/ExampleISiKMedikationsInformationParkinson2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationStatement/ExampleISiKMedikationsInformationParkinson3. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationStatement/ExampleISiKMedikationsInformationParkinson4. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationStatement/ExampleISiKMedikationsInformationParkinson5. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource List/ExampleISiKMedikationsListe. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource List/ExampleISiKMedikationsListeParkinson. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationAdministration/ExampleISiKMedikationsVerabreichung. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationAdministration/ExampleISiKMedikationsVerabreichung2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationAdministration/ExampleISiKMedikationsVerabreichung3. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationAdministration/ExampleISiKMedikationsVerabreichung4. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationRequest/ExampleISiKMedikationsVerordnung. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource MedicationRequest/ExampleISiKMedikationsVerordnung2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/Fachabteilungskontakt. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktBettenverlegung. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktEntlassung. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktFachbereichswechsel1. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktFachbereichswechsel2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktMinimal2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktNormal. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktStationaereAufnahme. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktStationswechsel1. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktStationswechsel2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/IsikPatientTemplate. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Medication/ParacetamolInfusion. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/PatientinMinimal. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/PatientinMusterfrau. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/PatientinNormal. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Practitioner/PractitionerWalterArzt. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource PractitionerRole/RolleImKrankenhausAllgemeinchirurgieBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource PractitionerRole/RolleImKrankenhausInnereMedizinBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/SZ1Nachstationaer. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/SZ1Patient. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/SZ1Stationaer. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/SZ1Vorstationaer. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/SZ2Encounter. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/SZ2Patient. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/isik-encounter-Sternenfall. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/isik-patient-156722. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
output/AkteureUndInteraktionen.html
information
The html source does not contain the publish box; this is recommended for publishing support (see note at https://confluence.hl7.org/spaces/FHIR/pages/66930646/FHIR+Implementation+Guide+Publishing+Requirements#FHIRImplementationGuidePublishingRequirements-PublishBox). Note that this is mandatory for HL7 specifications, and on the ci-build, but in other cases it's still recommended (this is only reported once, but applies for all pages)
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation' for "CapabilityStatement-Imports-Expectation-Extension" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation' for "CapabilityStatement-Imports-Expectation-Extension" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation' for "CapabilityStatement-Imports-Expectation-Extension" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation' for "CapabilityStatement-Imports-Expectation-Extension" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation' for "CapabilityStatement-Imports-Expectation-Extension" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation' for "CapabilityStatement-Imports-Expectation-Extension" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
No conformance term found in the text: 301 Abs. 3 SGB V. Dieser gehört zu den ‘Medizinischen Daten des Behandlungsfalls’ entsprechend der Definitionen für die Datenübermittlung
nach CONFORMANCE_STATEMENT_NOCONFWORD
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'unknown.html' for "?pkp-2?" cannot be resolvedHTML_LINK_CHECK_FAILED
1
warning
The HTML fragment 'ip-statements.xhtml' is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
2
warning
An HTML fragment from the set [cross-version-analysis.xhtml, cross-version-analysis-inline.xhtml] is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
3
warning
An HTML fragment from the set [dependency-table.xhtml, dependency-table-short.xhtml, dependency-table-nontech.xhtml] is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
4
warning
The HTML fragment 'globals-table.xhtml' is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Medikation/fsh-generated/resources/ImplementationGuide-medikation.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/medikation) does not match the URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//ImplementationGuide/medikation). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'http://fhir.org/packages/de.basisprofil.r4/ImplementationGuide/de.basisprofil.r4'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'http://fhir.org/packages/dvmd.kdl.r4/ImplementationGuide/dvmd.kdl.r4'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
value should not start or finish with whitespace '\nDieses Profil ermöglicht die Abbildung von Besuchen/Aufenthalten eines Patienten in einer Gesundheitseinrichtung.\n\n**Motivation**\n\nInformationen über die Besuche des Patienten entlang seines \nBehandlungspfades im Krankenhaus sind ein wichtiger Bestandteil \ndes einrichtungsinternen Datenaustausches. \nSie ermöglichen die Unterscheidung von stationären und ambulanten \nsowie aufgenommenen und entlassenen Patienten. \nWeiterhin ist aus den Besuchsinformationen der aktuelle Aufenthaltsort \ndes Patienten (Fachabteilung, Station, Bettplatz) ermittelbar. \nKlinische Ressourcen werden in FHIR durch Verlinkung auf die \nEncounter-Ressource in einen Kontext zum Besuch gestellt. \nDieser Kontext ist wichtig für die Steuerung von Zugriffsberechtigungen \nund Abrechnungsprozessen. \n\nZu Beginn der meisten klinischen Workflows steht die Auswahl \ndes Besuchskontextes. \nDies geschieht bspw. durch das Suchen der Encounter-Ressource \nanhand von Eigenschaften wie Aufnahmenummer, Fallart oder Aufnahmedatum. \nDaraufhin werden die zutreffenden Suchergebnisse angezeigt \nund der gewünschte Besuch ausgewählt.\n\nIn FHIR werden Besuche, Aufenthalte, aber auch virtuelle Kontakte mit der `Encounter`-Ressource repräsentiert.\n\nWeitere Hinweise zu den Abgrenzungen der Begrifflichkeiten Fall und Kontakt finden sie unter [Fall-Begriff in ISiK](https://gemspec.gematik.de/ig/fhir/isik/basis/6.0.0-rc/Abbildung-des-Konstrukts-Fall.html).\n\n**Kompatibilität**\n\nFür das Profil ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung wird eine Kompatibilität \nmit folgenden Profilen angestrebt; \nallerdings kann nicht sichergestellt werden, dass Instanzen, \ndie gegen ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung valide sind, \nauch valide sind gegen:\n\n* Profil [Kontakt mit einer Gesundheitseinrichtung \nder Medizininformatik-Initiative](https://www.medizininformatik-initiative.de/fhir/core/modul-fall/StructureDefinition/KontaktGesundheitseinrichtung)\n\nHinweise zu Inkompatibilitäten können über die [Portalseite](https://service.gematik.de/servicedesk/customer/portal/16) gemeldet werden.'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_String_WS
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.uv.ips#1.1.0 released on 2022-11-22, but the most recent appropriate version is 2.0.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be consideredIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING_OLD
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[3] (l1/c2213)
warning
The ImplementationGuide is based on FHIR version 4.0.1 but package hl7.fhir.uv.subscriptions-backport.r4#1.1.0 is based on FHIR version 4.0.0. In general, this version mismatch should be avoided - some tools will try to make this work with variable degrees of success, but others will not even tryIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[4] (l1/c2379)
warning
The canonical URL http://fhir.org/packages/de.basisprofil.r4/ImplementationGuide/de.basisprofil.r4 doesn't point to an actual ImplementationGuide resourceIG_DEPENDENCY_INVALID_URL
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[5] (l1/c2515)
error
The URL should refer directly to the ImplementationGuide resource (e.g. include '/ImplementationGuide/')IG_DEPENDENCY_DIRECT
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[5] (l1/c2515)
warning
The canonical URL http://fhir.de/packages/de.ihe-d.terminology doesn't point to an actual ImplementationGuide resourceIG_DEPENDENCY_INVALID_URL
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[6] (l1/c2660)
warning
The canonical URL http://fhir.org/packages/dvmd.kdl.r4/ImplementationGuide/dvmd.kdl.r4 doesn't point to an actual ImplementationGuide resourceIG_DEPENDENCY_INVALID_URL
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[7] (l1/c2839)
warning
The ImplementationGuide uses package ihe.formatcode.fhir#1.4.0 released on 2025-05-20, but the most recent appropriate version is 1.5.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be consideredIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING_OLD
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[8] (l1/c2983)
warning
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.uv.sdc#3.0.0 released on 2022-03-08, but the most recent appropriate version is 4.0.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be consideredIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING_OLD
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementLeistungserbringerRolle vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementLeistungserbringerRolle
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikamentRolle vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikamentRolle
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikamentWRITERolle vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikamentWRITERolle
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationInformationAkteur vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationInformationAkteur
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationInformationAkteur-expanded vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationInformationAkteur-expanded
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationInformationRolle vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationInformationRolle
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationInformationWRITERolle vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationInformationWRITERolle
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerabreichungAkteur vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerabreichungAkteur
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerabreichungAkteur-expanded vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerabreichungAkteur-expanded
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerabreichungRolle vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerabreichungRolle
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerabreichungWRITERolle vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerabreichungWRITERolle
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerordnungAkteur vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerordnungAkteur
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerordnungAkteur-expanded vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerordnungAkteur-expanded
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerordnungRolle vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerordnungRolle
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerordnungWRITERolle vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementMedikationVerordnungWRITERolle
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementStammdatenRolle vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CapabilityStatement/ISiKCapabilityStatementStammdatenRolle
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CodeSystem/ISiKBehandlungsergebnisRehaCS vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/ISiKBehandlungsergebnisRehaCS
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CodeSystem/ISiKBesondereBehandlungsformRehaCS vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/ISiKBesondereBehandlungsformRehaCS
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//CodeSystem/ISiKEncounterTypeErweiterungCS vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/ISiKEncounterTypeErweiterungCS
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[3]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[3]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[3]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[0]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[0]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[0]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
Wrong Display Name 'Inpatient' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP. Valid display is 'inpatient encounter' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP: 'Inpatient'' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc'; Wrong Display Name 'Inpatient' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP. Valid display is 'inpatient encounter' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US'))Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikament|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikament|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Medication.form.coding[0]: discriminator = true and ($this memberOf 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/ValueSet/medicine-doseform')
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/ifa/pzn' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/ifa/pzn' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/ifa/pzn' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikament|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikament|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Medication.form.coding[0]: discriminator = true and ($this memberOf 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/ValueSet/medicine-doseform')
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikament|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikament|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Medication.form.coding[0]: discriminator = true and ($this memberOf 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/ValueSet/medicine-doseform')
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikament|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikament|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Medication.form.coding[0]: discriminator = true and ($this memberOf 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/ValueSet/medicine-doseform')
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/ifa/pzn' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
The Coding provided (http://standardterms.edqm.eu#20045000) was not found in the value set 'Medicine Route of Administration - IPS' (http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/ValueSet/medicine-route-of-administration|1.1.0), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://standardterms.edqm.eu#20045000: 'Intravenous use'' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/ValueSet/medicine-route-of-administration|1.1.0')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://standardterms.edqm.eu#20045000) was not found in the value set 'Medicine Route of Administration - IPS' (http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/ValueSet/medicine-route-of-administration|1.1.0), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://standardterms.edqm.eu#20045000: 'Intravenous use'' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/ValueSet/medicine-route-of-administration|1.1.0')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/ifa/pzn' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/ifa/pzn' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/ifa/pzn' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/ifa/pzn' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/ifa/pzn' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/ifa/pzn' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/ifa/pzn' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/ifa/pzn' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
Constraint failed: kvid-1: 'Der unveränderliche Teil der KVID muss 10-stellig sein und mit einem Großbuchstaben anfangen (matches('^[A-Z][0-9]{9}$'))' (defined in http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/identifier-kvid-10)http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/identifier-kvid-10#kvid-1
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-namenszusatz' in url)
,
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' in url)
,
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-namenszusatz' in url)
,
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' in url)
,
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.gender.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/gender-amtlich-de' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.birthDate.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' in url)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.address[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.address[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' in url)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' in url)
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://snomed.info/sct' version 'http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20200131' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. Valid versions: http://snomed.info/sct/11000146104/version/20240930, http://snomed.info/sct/11000172109/version/20231115, http://snomed.info/sct/2011000195101/version/20230607, http://snomed.info/sct/32506021000036107/version/20230731, http://snomed.info/sct/45991000052106/version/20231130, http://snomed.info/sct/554471000005108/version/20250930, http://snomed.info/sct/731000124108/version/20230301, http://snomed.info/sct/731000124108/version/20240301, http://snomed.info/sct/731000124108/version/20250901, http://snomed.info/sct/827022005/version/20241216, http://snomed.info/sct/83821000000107/version/20230412, http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20240201, http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 and http://snomed.info/xsct/900000000000207008/version/20250814 (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://fhir.kbv.de/CodeSystem/KBV_CS_Base_Role_Care' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
PractitionerRole.code[0].coding[0]: discriminator = true and ($this memberOf 'https://fhir.kbv.de/ValueSet/KBV_VS_Base_Role_Care')
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
PractitionerRole.code[0].coding[0]: discriminator = true and ($this memberOf 'https://fhir.kbv.de/ValueSet/KBV_VS_Base_Role_Care')
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKAcceptedRisk vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKAcceptedRisk
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKBehandlungsziel vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKBehandlungsziel
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '2.0.0', found versions: 0.3.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 1.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0), 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation|2.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '2.0.0', found versions: 0.3.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 1.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0), 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation|2.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKMedicationRequestReplaces vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKMedicationRequestReplaces
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKMedicationStatementReplaces vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKMedicationStatementReplaces
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKMedikationsart vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKMedikationsart
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKRehaEntlassung vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKRehaEntlassung
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKSelbstmedikation vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKSelbstmedikation
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
ISiK-enc-8: The left side is inherently a collection, and so the expression 'coding.code != 'billing'' may fail or return false if there is more than one item in the content being evaluatedFHIRPATH_COLLECTION_STATUS_OPERATION_LEFT
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'http://ig.fhir.de/igs/medication/StructureDefinition/DosageDE'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'http://ig.fhir.de/igs/medication/StructureDefinition/DosageDE'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikationsInformation vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikationsInformation
--
StructureDefinition.text.div
error
Hyperlink 'unknown.html' at 'div/table/tr/td/a' for '?pkp-2?' does not resolve
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikationsListe vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikationsListe
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikationsVerabreichung vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikationsVerabreichung
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'http://ig.fhir.de/igs/medication/StructureDefinition/DosageDE'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'http://ig.fhir.de/igs/medication/StructureDefinition/DosageDE'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikationsVerordnung vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikationsVerordnung
--
StructureDefinition.text.div
error
Hyperlink 'unknown.html' at 'div/table/tr/td/a' for '?pkp-2?' does not resolve
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/regex|5.2.0 is deprecated with the note: 'This was deprecated in favor of using a constraint on the element using FHIRPath, since constraints allow for the provision of a human readable message associated with the regex'MSG_DEPENDS_ON_DEPRECATED_NOTE
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The repeating element has a pattern. The pattern will apply to all the repeats (this has not been clear to all users)SD_VALUE_TYPE_REPEAT_HINT
--
StructureDefinition.snapshot (l1/c461932)
warning
The slice 'Versichertennummer_PKV' on path 'Patient.identifier' is not marked as 'must-support' which is not consistent with the element that defines the slicing, where 'must-support' is true
--
input/resources/StructureDefinition-ISiKPatient
error
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The repeating element has a pattern. The pattern will apply to all the repeats (this has not been clear to all users)SD_VALUE_TYPE_REPEAT_HINT
--
StructureDefinition.snapshot (l1/c373631)
warning
The slice 'Geburtsname' on path 'Practitioner.name' is not marked as 'must-support' which is not consistent with the element that defines the slicing, where 'must-support' is true
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ISiKPersonImGesundheitsberuf vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPersonImGesundheitsberuf
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/ISiKSnomedCTCoding vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKSnomedCTCoding
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/MedicationQuantity vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/MedicationQuantity
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'http://ig.fhir.de/igs/medication/ValueSet/DosageDoseQuantityDE'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/MedicationQuantityDoseForm vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/MedicationQuantityDoseForm
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Medikation/input/resources/StructureDefinition-PlannedEndDate.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedEndDate) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedEndDate). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
StructureDefinition (l1/c16986)
error
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extensionVALIDATION_HL7_WG_NEEDED
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/PlannedEndDate vs http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedEndDate
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Medikation/input/resources/StructureDefinition-PlannedStartDate.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedStartDate) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedStartDate). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
StructureDefinition (l1/c17068)
error
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extensionVALIDATION_HL7_WG_NEEDED
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//StructureDefinition/PlannedStartDate vs http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedStartDate
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//ValueSet/ISiKBesondereBehandlungsformReha vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKBesondereBehandlungsformReha
Pinned the version of http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode to 10.0.0 from choices of 10.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0), 7.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 9.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0)PIN_VERSION
--
input/resources/ValueSet-ISiKEncounterClassDE
error
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//ValueSet/ISiKEncounterTypeErweiterungVS vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterTypeErweiterungVS
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikament|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikament|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikament|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKMedikament|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Wrong Display Name 'Inpatient' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP. Valid display is 'inpatient encounter' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
ISiK-enc-8: The left side is inherently a collection, and so the expression 'coding.code != 'billing'' may fail or return false if there is more than one item in the content being evaluated
The canonical URL http://fhir.org/packages/de.basisprofil.r4/ImplementationGuide/de.basisprofil.r4 doesn't point to an actual ImplementationGuide resource
The ImplementationGuide is based on FHIR version 4.0.1 but package hl7.fhir.uv.subscriptions-backport.r4#1.1.0 is based on FHIR version 4.0.0. In general, this version mismatch should be avoided - some tools will try to make this work with variable degrees of success, but others will not even try
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.uv.ips#1.1.0 released on 2022-11-22, but the most recent appropriate version is 2.0.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be considered
The ImplementationGuide uses package ihe.formatcode.fhir#1.4.0 released on 2025-05-20, but the most recent appropriate version is 1.5.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be considered
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.uv.sdc#3.0.0 released on 2022-03-08, but the most recent appropriate version is 4.0.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be considered
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/regex|5.2.0 is deprecated with the note: 'This was deprecated in favor of using a constraint on the element using FHIRPath, since constraints allow for the provision of a human readable message associated with the regex'
Pinned the version of http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode to 10.0.0 from choices of 10.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0), 7.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 9.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0)
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Medikation/fsh-generated/resources/ImplementationGuide-medikation.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/medikation) does not match the URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik//ImplementationGuide/medikation). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Medikation/input/resources/StructureDefinition-PlannedEndDate.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedEndDate) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedEndDate). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Medikation/input/resources/StructureDefinition-PlannedStartDate.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedStartDate) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedStartDate). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '2.0.0', found versions: 0.3.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 1.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0), 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation|2.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '2.0.0', found versions: 0.3.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 1.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0), 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation|2.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP: 'Inpatient'' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc'; Wrong Display Name 'Inpatient' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP. Valid display is 'inpatient encounter' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US'))
The Coding provided (http://standardterms.edqm.eu#20045000) was not found in the value set 'Medicine Route of Administration - IPS' (http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/ValueSet/medicine-route-of-administration|1.1.0), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://standardterms.edqm.eu#20045000: 'Intravenous use'' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/ValueSet/medicine-route-of-administration|1.1.0')
The Coding provided (http://standardterms.edqm.eu#20045000) was not found in the value set 'Medicine Route of Administration - IPS' (http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/ValueSet/medicine-route-of-administration|1.1.0), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://standardterms.edqm.eu#20045000: 'Intravenous use'' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/ValueSet/medicine-route-of-administration|1.1.0')
value should not start or finish with whitespace '\nDieses Profil ermöglicht die Abbildung von Besuchen/Aufenthalten eines Patienten in einer Gesundheitseinrichtung.\n\n**Motivation**\n\nInformationen über die Besuche des Patienten entlang seines \nBehandlungspfades im Krankenhaus sind ein wichtiger Bestandteil \ndes einrichtungsinternen Datenaustausches. \nSie ermöglichen die Unterscheidung von stationären und ambulanten \nsowie aufgenommenen und entlassenen Patienten. \nWeiterhin ist aus den Besuchsinformationen der aktuelle Aufenthaltsort \ndes Patienten (Fachabteilung, Station, Bettplatz) ermittelbar. \nKlinische Ressourcen werden in FHIR durch Verlinkung auf die \nEncounter-Ressource in einen Kontext zum Besuch gestellt. \nDieser Kontext ist wichtig für die Steuerung von Zugriffsberechtigungen \nund Abrechnungsprozessen. \n\nZu Beginn der meisten klinischen Workflows steht die Auswahl \ndes Besuchskontextes. \nDies geschieht bspw. durch das Suchen der Encounter-Ressource \nanhand von Eigenschaften wie Aufnahmenummer, Fallart oder Aufnahmedatum. \nDaraufhin werden die zutreffenden Suchergebnisse angezeigt \nund der gewünschte Besuch ausgewählt.\n\nIn FHIR werden Besuche, Aufenthalte, aber auch virtuelle Kontakte mit der `Encounter`-Ressource repräsentiert.\n\nWeitere Hinweise zu den Abgrenzungen der Begrifflichkeiten Fall und Kontakt finden sie unter [Fall-Begriff in ISiK](https://gemspec.gematik.de/ig/fhir/isik/basis/6.0.0-rc/Abbildung-des-Konstrukts-Fall.html).\n\n**Kompatibilität**\n\nFür das Profil ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung wird eine Kompatibilität \nmit folgenden Profilen angestrebt; \nallerdings kann nicht sichergestellt werden, dass Instanzen, \ndie gegen ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung valide sind, \nauch valide sind gegen:\n\n* Profil [Kontakt mit einer Gesundheitseinrichtung \nder Medizininformatik-Initiative](https://www.medizininformatik-initiative.de/fhir/core/modul-fall/StructureDefinition/KontaktGesundheitseinrichtung)\n\nHinweise zu Inkompatibilitäten können über die [Portalseite](https://service.gematik.de/servicedesk/customer/portal/16) gemeldet werden.'
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://snomed.info/sct' version 'http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20200131' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. Valid versions: http://snomed.info/sct/11000146104/version/20240930, http://snomed.info/sct/11000172109/version/20231115, http://snomed.info/sct/2011000195101/version/20230607, http://snomed.info/sct/32506021000036107/version/20230731, http://snomed.info/sct/45991000052106/version/20231130, http://snomed.info/sct/554471000005108/version/20250930, http://snomed.info/sct/731000124108/version/20230301, http://snomed.info/sct/731000124108/version/20240301, http://snomed.info/sct/731000124108/version/20250901, http://snomed.info/sct/827022005/version/20241216, http://snomed.info/sct/83821000000107/version/20230412, http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20240201, http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 and http://snomed.info/xsct/900000000000207008/version/20250814
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/atc' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extension
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extension
medikation
hl7.fhir.r4.examples