A clinical condition, problem, diagnosis, or other event, situation, issue, or clinical concept that has risen to a level of concern.

The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.

bedingtes Pflichtfeld/bedingtes MS: Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen MÜSSEN über eine id verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über eine idverfügen.

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.

An Extension

This condition has an unspecified relationship with another condition.

Die Deutschen Kodierrichtlinien und die 'German Modification' ermöglichen es teilweise, ICD-10-Codierte Diagnosen miteinander zu verknüpfen ('Kreuz-Stern-Ausrufezeichen-Notation'), diese aber dennoch wie eigenständige Diagnosen (mit jeweils eigener Diagnosesicherheit oder -Lokalisation) zu kommunizieren. Daher ist es in Deutschland nicht möglich, dem internationalen Usus zu folgen und verknüpfte Diagnosen als postkoordinierten Code einer Condition-Ressource aufzufassen. Statt dessen müssen sie zwei eigenständige Condition-Ressourcen abgebildet werden, die mit Hilfe der related-Extension miteinander verknüpft werden.
Die Sekundärdiagnose verweist jeweils auf die Primärdiagnose.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

The clinical status of the condition.

Begründung MS: Auch in Stufe 4 sind keine (client-seitigen) schreibenden Operationen für das Erstellen einer Condition-Ressource vorgesehen (siehe CapabilityStatement). Das heißt, entweder führen KISe entsprechende Informationen und exponieren diese, oder es gibt keinen pragmatischen Mechanismus (im ISIK-Kontext), um den Use Case einer zusätzlichen Annotation mittels Client zu erfüllen. Da alle KIS-Hersteller, die sich zu Wort gemeldet haben, eine Befüllung von Condition.clinicalStatus NICHT unterstützen, erscheint das MS nach übergreifender Definition und ein verpflichtender Testfall nicht angemessen.
Einschränkung der übergreifenden MS-Definition: Verfügt ein bestätigungsrelevantes System nicht über die Datenstruktur zur Hinterlegung des Status einer Diagnose, so MUSS dieses System die Information NICHT abbilden. Das System MUSS jedoch clinicalStatus befüllen, sofern die entsprechende Information verfügbar ist.
Hinweis: Für Diagnosen aus der ambulanten Versorgung können die Werte für clinicalStatus und verificationStatus aus dem ICD-10-Zusatzkennzeichen für die Diagnosesicherheit abgeleitet werden. Das entsprechende Mapping kann den Deutschen Basisprofilen entnommen werden.

The clinical status of the condition or diagnosis.

The verification status to support the clinical status of the condition.

Einschränkung der übergreifenden MS-Definition: Die Implementierung dieses Elements ist für Server optional. Die Kennzeichnung als Must-Support erfolgt, da es sich um ein als Modifier-Element markiertes Feld in der Kernspezifikation handelt. Clients, die eine ISiKPatient-Instanz verarbeiten, SOLLEN den Wert dieses Elements vor der weiteren Verarbeitung prüfen.

WICHTIGER Hinweis für Implementierer:

• Alle server-seitigen Implementierungen SOLLEN in der Lage sein, die systemintern möglichen Statuswerte korrekt in FHIR abzubilden, mindestens aber den Status 'confirmed'.
• Alle client-seitigen Implementierungen SOLLEN in der Lage sein, sämtliche Status-Codes zu interpretieren und dem Anwender in angemessener Form darstellen zu können.

The verification status to support or decline the clinical status of the condition or diagnosis.

Identification of the condition, problem or diagnosis.

Diagnosen SOLLEN mindestens entweder mit einem der angebenen standardisierten Codier-Verfahren codiert werden. Ist keine Codierung möglich, MUSS statt dessen eine textuelle Beschreibung der Prozedur angegeben werden.
Begründung Pflichtfeld: Ist weder eine Codierung noch eine textuelle Beschreibung vorhanden, besitzt diese Ressource keine medizinische Aussagefähigkeit.

Identification of the condition or diagnosis.

0..1 to account for primarily narrative only resources.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.

Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.

Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Motivation MS: URL des CodeSystems des kodierten Wertes.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

Bie Verwendung von ICD-10-GM ist die Angabe der Version zwingend erforderlich. Hierdurch wird der Tatsache Rechnung getragen, dass jede der jährlich neu erscheinenden Fassung von ICD-10-GM ein neues Codesystem darstellt.

Motivation MS: Version des kodierten Wertes.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Motivation MS: Kodierter Wert aus einem CodeSystem.

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Motivation MS: Anzeigename des kodierten Wertes.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

Bie Verwendung von Alpha-ID ist die Angabe der Version zwingend erforderlich. Hierdurch wird der Tatsache Rechnung getragen, dass jede der jährlich neu erscheinenden Fassung von Alpha-ID ein neues Codesystem darstellt.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

The anatomical location where this condition manifests itself.

Begründung MS: Harmonisierung mit KBV-Profil (KBV_PR_Base_Condition_Diagnosis)

Codes describing anatomical locations. May include laterality.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Indicates the patient or group who the condition record is associated with.

Begründung Must-Support: Ein Patientenbezug der Diagnose MUSS stets zum Zwecke der Nachvollziehbarkeit und Datenintegrität vorliegen.

Group is typically used for veterinary or public health use cases.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Begründung MS: Die Verlinkung auf eine Patienten-Ressource dient der technischen Zuordnung der Dokumentation zu einem Patienten und ermöglicht wichtige API-Funktionen wie verkettete Suche, (Reverse-)Include etc. Im ISik Kontext MUSS die referenzierte Ressource konform zu ISiKPatient sein. Jenseits von ISiK KÖNNEN weitere Instanzen mit anderen Profilen referenziert werden.

The Encounter during which this Condition was created or to which the creation of this record is tightly associated.

Begründung Must-Support: Ein Aufenthaltsbezug der Diagnose MUSS stets zum Zwecke der Nachvollziehbarkeit und Datenintegrität vorliegen.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Begründung Pflichtfeld: Die Verlinkung auf eine Encounter-Ressource dient der technischen Zuordnung der Dokumentation zu einem Aufenthalt und ermöglicht wichtige API-Funktionen wie verkettete Suche, (Reverse-)Include etc. WICHTIGER Hinweis für Implementierer: Die Zuordnung MUSS auf einen Encounter der Ebene "Abteilungskontakt" (siehe hierzu Basismodul > UseCases > Abbildung des Konstruktes "Fall") erfolgen.
Bei der Auswahl des Encounters ist zu beachten, dass unter einer (Abrechnungs-)"Fallnummer" (hier: Encounter.account) unter Umständen mehrere Encounter gruppiert sein können (z.B. stationärer Besuch mit mehreren vor- und nachstationären Aufenthalten.) Im ISik Kontext MUSS die referenzierte Ressource konform zu ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung sein. Jenseits von ISiK KÖNNEN weitere Instanzen mit anderen Profilen referenziert werden.

Estimated or actual date or date-time the condition began, in the opinion of the clinician.

Datum oder Alter/Lebensphase des Erkrankungsbeginns Begründung MS: Die Kenntnis des Erkrankungszeitraumes ist wichtig für die korrekte Einschätzung der medizinischen Relevanz einer Erkraknung.
Einschränkung der übergreifenden MS-Definition: Verfügt ein bestätigungsrelevantes System nicht über die Datenstruktur zur Hinterlegung des Erkrankungszeitraumes, so MUSS dieses System die Information NICHT abbilden. Das System MUSS jedoch klinischen Status (active/inactive/resolved...) der Diagnose korrekt angeben, sofern die Information verfügbar ist.

Estimated or actual date or date-time the condition began, in the opinion of the clinician.

''Begründung MS:** Siehe onset[x]

Estimated or actual date or date-time the condition began, in the opinion of the clinician.

''Begründung MS:** Siehe onset[x]

Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.

Alternative Angabe, wenn genauere Eingrenzungen des Zeitraums nicht möglich sind, insbesondere im Kontext anamnestischer Diagnosen

How the value should be understood and represented - whether the actual value is greater or less than the stated value due to measurement issues; e.g. if the comparator is "<" , then the real value is < stated value.

How the Quantity should be understood and represented.

Need a framework for handling measures where the value is <5ug/L or >400mg/L due to the limitations of measuring methodology.

The date or estimated date that the condition resolved or went into remission. This is called "abatement" because of the many overloaded connotations associated with "remission" or "resolution" - Conditions are never really resolved, but they can abate.

Ende des klinisch relevanten Zeitraums der Diagnose
Begründung MS: Die Kenntnis des Erkrankungszeitraumes ist wichtig für die korrekte Einschätzung der medizinischen Relevanz einer Erkraknung.
Einschränkung der übergreifenden MS-Definition: Verfügt ein bestätigungsrelevantes System nicht über die Datenstruktur zur Hinterlegung des Erkrankungszeitraumes, so MUSS dieses System die Information NICHT abbilden. Das System MUSS jedoch klinischen Status (active/inactive/resolved...) der Diagnose korrekt angeben, sofern die Information verfügbar ist.

The date or estimated date that the condition resolved or went into remission. This is called "abatement" because of the many overloaded connotations associated with "remission" or "resolution" - Conditions are never really resolved, but they can abate.

''Begründung MS:** Siehe abatement[x]

Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.

Alternative Angabe, wenn genauere Eingrenzungen des Zeitraums nicht möglich sind, insbesondere im Kontext anamnestischer Diagnosen

How the value should be understood and represented - whether the actual value is greater or less than the stated value due to measurement issues; e.g. if the comparator is "<" , then the real value is < stated value.

How the Quantity should be understood and represented.

Need a framework for handling measures where the value is <5ug/L or >400mg/L due to the limitations of measuring methodology.

The date or estimated date that the condition resolved or went into remission. This is called "abatement" because of the many overloaded connotations associated with "remission" or "resolution" - Conditions are never really resolved, but they can abate.

''Begründung MS:** Siehe abatement[x]

The recordedDate represents when this particular Condition record was created in the system, which is often a system-generated date.

Datum, an dem die Diagnose dokumentiert wurde.
Begründung Pflichtfeld: Das Dokumentationsdatum der Diagnose MUSS zu Qualitätssicherungszwecken angegeben werden. Dies ist das fachliche Dokumentationsdatum, nicht zu verwechseln mit der technischen Anlage des Datensatzes im Primärsystem. Diese beiden Daten können jedoch identisch sein.
Hinweis: Das Recorded Date MUSS mindestens auf den Monat genau angegeben werden.

Additional information about the Condition. This is a general notes/comments entry for description of the Condition, its diagnosis and prognosis.

Ergänzende Hinweise und Anmerkungen zur Diagnose

bedingtes Pflichtfeld/bedingtes MS: Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen MÜSSEN über eine id verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über eine idverfügen.

Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen SOLLEN über eine versionID verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über eine versionIDverfügen.

Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen SOLLEN über ein lastUpdate verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über ein lastUpdateverfügen.

Die Deutschen Kodierrichtlinien und die 'German Modification' ermöglichen es teilweise, ICD-10-Codierte Diagnosen miteinander zu verknüpfen ('Kreuz-Stern-Ausrufezeichen-Notation'), diese aber dennoch wie eigenständige Diagnosen (mit jeweils eigener Diagnosesicherheit oder -Lokalisation) zu kommunizieren. Daher ist es in Deutschland nicht möglich, dem internationalen Usus zu folgen und verknüpfte Diagnosen als postkoordinierten Code einer Condition-Ressource aufzufassen. Statt dessen müssen sie zwei eigenständige Condition-Ressourcen abgebildet werden, die mit Hilfe der related-Extension miteinander verknüpft werden.
Die Sekundärdiagnose verweist jeweils auf die Primärdiagnose.

Begründung MS: Auch in Stufe 4 sind keine (client-seitigen) schreibenden Operationen für das Erstellen einer Condition-Ressource vorgesehen (siehe CapabilityStatement). Das heißt, entweder führen KISe entsprechende Informationen und exponieren diese, oder es gibt keinen pragmatischen Mechanismus (im ISIK-Kontext), um den Use Case einer zusätzlichen Annotation mittels Client zu erfüllen. Da alle KIS-Hersteller, die sich zu Wort gemeldet haben, eine Befüllung von Condition.clinicalStatus NICHT unterstützen, erscheint das MS nach übergreifender Definition und ein verpflichtender Testfall nicht angemessen.
Einschränkung der übergreifenden MS-Definition: Verfügt ein bestätigungsrelevantes System nicht über die Datenstruktur zur Hinterlegung des Status einer Diagnose, so MUSS dieses System die Information NICHT abbilden. Das System MUSS jedoch clinicalStatus befüllen, sofern die entsprechende Information verfügbar ist.
Hinweis: Für Diagnosen aus der ambulanten Versorgung können die Werte für clinicalStatus und verificationStatus aus dem ICD-10-Zusatzkennzeichen für die Diagnosesicherheit abgeleitet werden. Das entsprechende Mapping kann den Deutschen Basisprofilen entnommen werden.

Einschränkung der übergreifenden MS-Definition: Die Implementierung dieses Elements ist für Server optional. Die Kennzeichnung als Must-Support erfolgt, da es sich um ein als Modifier-Element markiertes Feld in der Kernspezifikation handelt. Clients, die eine ISiKPatient-Instanz verarbeiten, SOLLEN den Wert dieses Elements vor der weiteren Verarbeitung prüfen.

WICHTIGER Hinweis für Implementierer:

• Alle server-seitigen Implementierungen SOLLEN in der Lage sein, die systemintern möglichen Statuswerte korrekt in FHIR abzubilden, mindestens aber den Status 'confirmed'.
• Alle client-seitigen Implementierungen SOLLEN in der Lage sein, sämtliche Status-Codes zu interpretieren und dem Anwender in angemessener Form darstellen zu können.

Diagnosen SOLLEN mindestens entweder mit einem der angebenen standardisierten Codier-Verfahren codiert werden. Ist keine Codierung möglich, MUSS statt dessen eine textuelle Beschreibung der Prozedur angegeben werden.
Begründung Pflichtfeld: Ist weder eine Codierung noch eine textuelle Beschreibung vorhanden, besitzt diese Ressource keine medizinische Aussagefähigkeit.

Begründung MS: Harmonisierung mit KBV-Profil (KBV_PR_Base_Condition_Diagnosis)

Begründung Must-Support: Ein Patientenbezug der Diagnose MUSS stets zum Zwecke der Nachvollziehbarkeit und Datenintegrität vorliegen.

Begründung MS: Die Verlinkung auf eine Patienten-Ressource dient der technischen Zuordnung der Dokumentation zu einem Patienten und ermöglicht wichtige API-Funktionen wie verkettete Suche, (Reverse-)Include etc. Im ISik Kontext MUSS die referenzierte Ressource konform zu ISiKPatient sein. Jenseits von ISiK KÖNNEN weitere Instanzen mit anderen Profilen referenziert werden.

Begründung Must-Support: Ein Aufenthaltsbezug der Diagnose MUSS stets zum Zwecke der Nachvollziehbarkeit und Datenintegrität vorliegen.

Begründung Pflichtfeld: Die Verlinkung auf eine Encounter-Ressource dient der technischen Zuordnung der Dokumentation zu einem Aufenthalt und ermöglicht wichtige API-Funktionen wie verkettete Suche, (Reverse-)Include etc. WICHTIGER Hinweis für Implementierer: Die Zuordnung MUSS auf einen Encounter der Ebene "Abteilungskontakt" (siehe hierzu Basismodul > UseCases > Abbildung des Konstruktes "Fall") erfolgen.
Bei der Auswahl des Encounters ist zu beachten, dass unter einer (Abrechnungs-)"Fallnummer" (hier: Encounter.account) unter Umständen mehrere Encounter gruppiert sein können (z.B. stationärer Besuch mit mehreren vor- und nachstationären Aufenthalten.) Im ISik Kontext MUSS die referenzierte Ressource konform zu ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung sein. Jenseits von ISiK KÖNNEN weitere Instanzen mit anderen Profilen referenziert werden.

Datum oder Alter/Lebensphase des Erkrankungsbeginns Begründung MS: Die Kenntnis des Erkrankungszeitraumes ist wichtig für die korrekte Einschätzung der medizinischen Relevanz einer Erkraknung.
Einschränkung der übergreifenden MS-Definition: Verfügt ein bestätigungsrelevantes System nicht über die Datenstruktur zur Hinterlegung des Erkrankungszeitraumes, so MUSS dieses System die Information NICHT abbilden. Das System MUSS jedoch klinischen Status (active/inactive/resolved...) der Diagnose korrekt angeben, sofern die Information verfügbar ist.

''Begründung MS:** Siehe onset[x]

''Begründung MS:** Siehe onset[x]

Alternative Angabe, wenn genauere Eingrenzungen des Zeitraums nicht möglich sind, insbesondere im Kontext anamnestischer Diagnosen

Ende des klinisch relevanten Zeitraums der Diagnose
Begründung MS: Die Kenntnis des Erkrankungszeitraumes ist wichtig für die korrekte Einschätzung der medizinischen Relevanz einer Erkraknung.
Einschränkung der übergreifenden MS-Definition: Verfügt ein bestätigungsrelevantes System nicht über die Datenstruktur zur Hinterlegung des Erkrankungszeitraumes, so MUSS dieses System die Information NICHT abbilden. Das System MUSS jedoch klinischen Status (active/inactive/resolved...) der Diagnose korrekt angeben, sofern die Information verfügbar ist.

''Begründung MS:** Siehe abatement[x]

Alternative Angabe, wenn genauere Eingrenzungen des Zeitraums nicht möglich sind, insbesondere im Kontext anamnestischer Diagnosen

''Begründung MS:** Siehe abatement[x]

Datum, an dem die Diagnose dokumentiert wurde.
Begründung Pflichtfeld: Das Dokumentationsdatum der Diagnose MUSS zu Qualitätssicherungszwecken angegeben werden. Dies ist das fachliche Dokumentationsdatum, nicht zu verwechseln mit der technischen Anlage des Datensatzes im Primärsystem. Diese beiden Daten können jedoch identisch sein.
Hinweis: Das Recorded Date MUSS mindestens auf den Monat genau angegeben werden.

Ergänzende Hinweise und Anmerkungen zur Diagnose

A clinical condition, problem, diagnosis, or other event, situation, issue, or clinical concept that has risen to a level of concern.

The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.

bedingtes Pflichtfeld/bedingtes MS: Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen MÜSSEN über eine id verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über eine idverfügen.

The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The version specific identifier, as it appears in the version portion of the URL. This value changes when the resource is created, updated, or deleted.

Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen SOLLEN über eine versionID verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über eine versionIDverfügen.

When the resource last changed - e.g. when the version changed.

Alle von einem Server bereitgestellten Ressourcen SOLLEN über ein lastUpdate verfügen. Von Clients erzeugte Ressourcen, die im Kontext einer CREATE-Interaktion übermittelt werden, MÜSSEN NICHT über ein lastUpdateverfügen.

A uri that identifies the source system of the resource. This provides a minimal amount of Provenance information that can be used to track or differentiate the source of information in the resource. The source may identify another FHIR server, document, message, database, etc.

In the provenance resource, this corresponds to Provenance.entity.what[x]. The exact use of the source (and the implied Provenance.entity.role) is left to implementer discretion. Only one nominated source is allowed; for additional provenance details, a full Provenance resource should be used.

This element can be used to indicate where the current master source of a resource that has a canonical URL if the resource is no longer hosted at the canonical URL.

A list of profiles (references to StructureDefinition resources) that this resource claims to conform to. The URL is a reference to StructureDefinition.url.

It is up to the server and/or other infrastructure of policy to determine whether/how these claims are verified and/or updated over time. The list of profile URLs is a set.

Security labels applied to this resource. These tags connect specific resources to the overall security policy and infrastructure.

The security labels can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of security labels is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored.

Security Labels from the Healthcare Privacy and Security Classification System.

Tags applied to this resource. Tags are intended to be used to identify and relate resources to process and workflow, and applications are not required to consider the tags when interpreting the meaning of a resource.

The tags can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of tags is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored.

Codes that represent various types of tags, commonly workflow-related; e.g. "Needs review by Dr. Jones".

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.

The base language in which the resource is written.

Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource. Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).

A human language.

A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded information is added later.

These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.

This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. Contained resources may have profiles and tags In their meta elements, but SHALL NOT have security labels.

An Extension

This condition has an unspecified relationship with another condition.

Die Deutschen Kodierrichtlinien und die 'German Modification' ermöglichen es teilweise, ICD-10-Codierte Diagnosen miteinander zu verknüpfen ('Kreuz-Stern-Ausrufezeichen-Notation'), diese aber dennoch wie eigenständige Diagnosen (mit jeweils eigener Diagnosesicherheit oder -Lokalisation) zu kommunizieren. Daher ist es in Deutschland nicht möglich, dem internationalen Usus zu folgen und verknüpfte Diagnosen als postkoordinierten Code einer Condition-Ressource aufzufassen. Statt dessen müssen sie zwei eigenständige Condition-Ressourcen abgebildet werden, die mit Hilfe der related-Extension miteinander verknüpft werden.
Die Sekundärdiagnose verweist jeweils auf die Primärdiagnose.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

Business identifiers assigned to this condition by the performer or other systems which remain constant as the resource is updated and propagates from server to server.

This is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion). It is best practice for the identifier to only appear on a single resource instance, however business practices may occasionally dictate that multiple resource instances with the same identifier can exist - possibly even with different resource types. For example, multiple Patient and a Person resource instance might share the same social insurance number.

Allows identification of the condition as it is known by various participating systems and in a way that remains consistent across servers.

The clinical status of the condition.

Begründung MS: Auch in Stufe 4 sind keine (client-seitigen) schreibenden Operationen für das Erstellen einer Condition-Ressource vorgesehen (siehe CapabilityStatement). Das heißt, entweder führen KISe entsprechende Informationen und exponieren diese, oder es gibt keinen pragmatischen Mechanismus (im ISIK-Kontext), um den Use Case einer zusätzlichen Annotation mittels Client zu erfüllen. Da alle KIS-Hersteller, die sich zu Wort gemeldet haben, eine Befüllung von Condition.clinicalStatus NICHT unterstützen, erscheint das MS nach übergreifender Definition und ein verpflichtender Testfall nicht angemessen.
Einschränkung der übergreifenden MS-Definition: Verfügt ein bestätigungsrelevantes System nicht über die Datenstruktur zur Hinterlegung des Status einer Diagnose, so MUSS dieses System die Information NICHT abbilden. Das System MUSS jedoch clinicalStatus befüllen, sofern die entsprechende Information verfügbar ist.
Hinweis: Für Diagnosen aus der ambulanten Versorgung können die Werte für clinicalStatus und verificationStatus aus dem ICD-10-Zusatzkennzeichen für die Diagnosesicherheit abgeleitet werden. Das entsprechende Mapping kann den Deutschen Basisprofilen entnommen werden.

The clinical status of the condition or diagnosis.

The verification status to support the clinical status of the condition.

Einschränkung der übergreifenden MS-Definition: Die Implementierung dieses Elements ist für Server optional. Die Kennzeichnung als Must-Support erfolgt, da es sich um ein als Modifier-Element markiertes Feld in der Kernspezifikation handelt. Clients, die eine ISiKPatient-Instanz verarbeiten, SOLLEN den Wert dieses Elements vor der weiteren Verarbeitung prüfen.

WICHTIGER Hinweis für Implementierer:

• Alle server-seitigen Implementierungen SOLLEN in der Lage sein, die systemintern möglichen Statuswerte korrekt in FHIR abzubilden, mindestens aber den Status 'confirmed'.
• Alle client-seitigen Implementierungen SOLLEN in der Lage sein, sämtliche Status-Codes zu interpretieren und dem Anwender in angemessener Form darstellen zu können.

The verification status to support or decline the clinical status of the condition or diagnosis.

A category assigned to the condition.

The categorization is often highly contextual and may appear poorly differentiated or not very useful in other contexts.

A category assigned to the condition.

A subjective assessment of the severity of the condition as evaluated by the clinician.

Coding of the severity with a terminology is preferred, where possible.

A subjective assessment of the severity of the condition as evaluated by the clinician.

Identification of the condition, problem or diagnosis.

Diagnosen SOLLEN mindestens entweder mit einem der angebenen standardisierten Codier-Verfahren codiert werden. Ist keine Codierung möglich, MUSS statt dessen eine textuelle Beschreibung der Prozedur angegeben werden.
Begründung Pflichtfeld: Ist weder eine Codierung noch eine textuelle Beschreibung vorhanden, besitzt diese Ressource keine medizinische Aussagefähigkeit.

Identification of the condition or diagnosis.

0..1 to account for primarily narrative only resources.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.

Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.

Optional Extension Element - found in all resources.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Motivation MS: URL des CodeSystems des kodierten Wertes.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

Bie Verwendung von ICD-10-GM ist die Angabe der Version zwingend erforderlich. Hierdurch wird der Tatsache Rechnung getragen, dass jede der jährlich neu erscheinenden Fassung von ICD-10-GM ein neues Codesystem darstellt.

Motivation MS: Version des kodierten Wertes.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Motivation MS: Kodierter Wert aus einem CodeSystem.

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Motivation MS: Anzeigename des kodierten Wertes.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

Bie Verwendung von Alpha-ID ist die Angabe der Version zwingend erforderlich. Hierdurch wird der Tatsache Rechnung getragen, dass jede der jährlich neu erscheinenden Fassung von Alpha-ID ein neues Codesystem darstellt.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

The anatomical location where this condition manifests itself.

Begründung MS: Harmonisierung mit KBV-Profil (KBV_PR_Base_Condition_Diagnosis)

Codes describing anatomical locations. May include laterality.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Indicates the patient or group who the condition record is associated with.

Begründung Must-Support: Ein Patientenbezug der Diagnose MUSS stets zum Zwecke der Nachvollziehbarkeit und Datenintegrität vorliegen.

Group is typically used for veterinary or public health use cases.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Begründung MS: Die Verlinkung auf eine Patienten-Ressource dient der technischen Zuordnung der Dokumentation zu einem Patienten und ermöglicht wichtige API-Funktionen wie verkettete Suche, (Reverse-)Include etc. Im ISik Kontext MUSS die referenzierte Ressource konform zu ISiKPatient sein. Jenseits von ISiK KÖNNEN weitere Instanzen mit anderen Profilen referenziert werden.

The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent.

The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).

This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.

Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model).

An identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.

When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy.

When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference

Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it.

Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).

Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.

This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.

The Encounter during which this Condition was created or to which the creation of this record is tightly associated.

Begründung Must-Support: Ein Aufenthaltsbezug der Diagnose MUSS stets zum Zwecke der Nachvollziehbarkeit und Datenintegrität vorliegen.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Begründung Pflichtfeld: Die Verlinkung auf eine Encounter-Ressource dient der technischen Zuordnung der Dokumentation zu einem Aufenthalt und ermöglicht wichtige API-Funktionen wie verkettete Suche, (Reverse-)Include etc. WICHTIGER Hinweis für Implementierer: Die Zuordnung MUSS auf einen Encounter der Ebene "Abteilungskontakt" (siehe hierzu Basismodul > UseCases > Abbildung des Konstruktes "Fall") erfolgen.
Bei der Auswahl des Encounters ist zu beachten, dass unter einer (Abrechnungs-)"Fallnummer" (hier: Encounter.account) unter Umständen mehrere Encounter gruppiert sein können (z.B. stationärer Besuch mit mehreren vor- und nachstationären Aufenthalten.) Im ISik Kontext MUSS die referenzierte Ressource konform zu ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung sein. Jenseits von ISiK KÖNNEN weitere Instanzen mit anderen Profilen referenziert werden.

The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent.

The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).

This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.

Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model).

An identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.

When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy.

When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference

Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it.

Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).